The president made this request in the oval office ti Comey in February. Donald Trump has fired the FBI director in recent days.
It is memo written by Comey at the end of this meeting that states this conservation. The president would have said, “I hope you can let this go.”
According to the New York daily News, this new element is further evidence that the president attempted to interfere in an FBI investigation.
The White House denies
The White House immediately refuted the New York Times news.
Michael Flynn resigned one day before the February 14 meeting when he had just been revealed that he had lied about the nature of his contacts with the Russian ambassador.
The president reiterated that he believed that the former general was a decent man who served and protected his country, the White House said in a statement. But he never asked Mr. Comey or anyone else to stop an investigation of him, “she adds.
Exactly one week ago, Donald Trump fired Comey, referring to his mismanagement of the e-mail investigation of his former rival in the presidential race, Hillary Clinton.
According to the New York Times, James Comey wrote in his note that Donald Trump had told him that Michael Flynn had done nothing wrong. James Comey would not have replied to the president on the idea of ending his investigation and would simply have said, “I agree that he is a good man. ”
The main question facing those seeking impeachment, legal analysts say, is determining whether Trump acted with intent. According to the U.S. Attorneys’ Manual, the government must show that Trump “corruptly endeavored to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law.” And that could be difficult.
“Everything depends on intent, and it seems unlikely,” says Michael McConnell, director of the Constitutional Law Center at Stanford Law School. But he added, “When I say unlikely, I don’t mean impossible.”
Ironically, while Trump’s shifting explanations into why he fired Comey last week have damaged his credibility and that of his officials, these inconsistencies could actually help his case against obstruction because they mean “proving [Trump’s] precise mind beyond a reasonable doubt might be very tricky,” writers at the Lawfare blog point out.